IAE Academy

GATE BT

Enzyme immobilisation and diffusion effects

Immobilising an enzyme on or inside a solid support lets it be retained, reused and run continuously, but substrate must then cross a liquid film and often diffuse through pores before it reacts, so the measured rate reflects a competition between reaction and mass transfer. That competition is captured by the Damköhler number (external film), the Thiele modulus and effectiveness factor (inside the particle) and the observable modulus (from measured rates). Numerical problems on this topic reduce to computing these groups with the right characteristic length and reference concentration, and to reasoning about how diffusion and partitioning distort apparent , , reaction order and activation energy.

2 previous-year questions · 2 solved · 5 practice questions

Immobilisation methods and what they change

An immobilised enzyme is confined to a solid support or a defined region so that it can be retained, reused and operated continuously, and so that the product stream leaves free of enzyme. The price is that substrate must reach the enzyme: first across the liquid film around the support (external mass transfer), and, if the enzyme sits inside a porous particle or gel, through the pores (internal diffusion). Every kinetic constant measured on an immobilised enzyme is therefore an apparent constant unless diffusion and partitioning effects have been shown to be negligible.

Method

How the enzyme is held

Advantages

Limitations

Adsorption

Physical forces (van der Waals, ionic, hydrophobic) on carriers such as ion-exchange resins, silica, alumina or activated carbon

Simple, mild and cheap; little loss of activity; carrier can be regenerated

Weak binding: the enzyme desorbs (leaches) with changes in pH, ionic strength, temperature or substrate concentration

Covalent binding

Covalent bonds between enzyme side-chain groups (e.g. amino groups) and an activated support, e.g. glutaraldehyde- or cyanogen-bromide-activated carriers

Strong attachment, essentially no leakage

Harsher chemistry can modify residues near the active site and lower activity; the support is usually not reusable

Entrapment

Enzyme or whole cells trapped in the lattice of a gel, e.g. calcium alginate, κ-carrageenan, polyacrylamide or agar

Mild; enzyme not chemically modified; suitable for whole cells

Pore-diffusion resistance; small enzymes can leak through large pores; large substrates cannot enter the gel

Encapsulation

Enzyme enclosed inside a semipermeable membrane: microcapsules, liposomes, hollow fibres, membrane reactors

High enzyme loading; enzyme retained while small substrates and products pass

Membrane mass-transfer resistance; membrane fouling or rupture; unsuitable for large substrates

Cross-linking

Carrier-free: enzyme molecules joined to one another by a bifunctional reagent such as glutaraldehyde, forming cross-linked aggregates or crystals

No carrier, so high activity per unit volume; often improved stability

Cross-linking chemistry can reduce activity; aggregates can be mechanically weak; internal diffusion resistance

Why the observed rate of an immobilised enzyme differs from the free enzyme's

  1. Conformational and steric effects — binding can distort the enzyme or block access to its active site. These change the enzyme's true constants (usually a lower ; can change too, for example when a large substrate is sterically hindered), not merely the apparent ones.

  2. Partitioning — a charged or hydrophobic support makes the substrate, product and concentrations in the enzyme's microenvironment differ from those in the bulk liquid.

  3. External mass transfer — substrate crosses a stagnant liquid film around the particle, so the surface concentration is below the bulk concentration .

  4. Internal diffusion — inside a porous particle or gel, substrate is consumed as it diffuses inward, so enzyme near the centre sees less substrate than enzyme near the surface.

Immobilisation often improves thermal and operational stability, but that is a tendency, not a rule: each preparation has to be tested. The last three effects in the list change only the apparent kinetics; the enzyme's intrinsic constants are unchanged by them.

ELECTROSTATIC PARTITIONING AND THE APPARENT KM

= signed charge number of the substrate, = signed electrostatic potential of the support (V), C/mol, J mol K, in K. Assumes a uniform potential in the enzyme's microenvironment and Boltzmann partitioning; the effect is largest at low ionic strength, because added salt screens the charge. Same signs (): substrate repelled, . Opposite signs: substrate attracted, . Partitioning alone leaves unchanged. More generally, any partition coefficient (electrostatic or hydrophobic) gives with unchanged.

LOCAL PH NEXT TO A CHARGED SUPPORT

The same Boltzmann partitioning applied to (), with and the same assumptions. A negatively charged (polyanionic) support has , so the local pH is lower than the bulk pH.

EXAM TIP

pH-optimum shift, stated against the bulk pH: a polyanionic support concentrates near the enzyme, so the bulk pH must be raised to reach the intrinsic optimum locally — the apparent optimum moves to higher pH. A polycationic support moves it to lower pH. The intrinsic pH optimum of the enzyme has not changed.

External mass transfer and the Damköhler number

Take the simplest case: enzyme attached to the outer surface of a non-porous support, following Michaelis–Menten kinetics per unit surface area. Substrate crosses a liquid film with mass-transfer coefficient from the bulk concentration to the surface concentration . At steady state the flux through the film equals the rate of reaction at the surface. The analysis assumes a uniform over the surface, enzyme spread evenly over it, and no partitioning.

Units used here: concentrations in mol/m (1 mol/m = 1 mmol/L), in mol m s (per unit surface area), in m/s.

FILM–REACTION BALANCE AT THE SURFACE

Steady state; enzyme on the external surface only, no internal diffusion. Solve for ; the observed rate per unit area is either side of the equation.

DAMKÖHLER NUMBER

Dimensionless. The maximum mass-transfer rate is , reached when . Large favours film control, small favours reaction control (see the criteria below).

DIMENSIONLESS SURFACE CONCENTRATION (EXACT)

Exact for Michaelis–Menten kinetics. It comes from the quadratic ; take the positive root ().

EXTERNAL EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR

Referred to the bulk concentration. Always for Michaelis–Menten kinetics, because .

FIRST-ORDER LIMIT (S MUCH SMALLER THAN KM)

(m/s) is the surface first-order rate constant. Film and reaction act as resistances in series. Note : it uses in place of .

Reading the Damköhler number

  1. Reaction controlled when (so is always enough): , , observed rate . The rate responds to enzyme loading and temperature, not to stirring.

  2. Film (mass-transfer) controlled when : and observed rate , first order in whatever the intrinsic kinetics. At high substrate () the condition is simply ; at low substrate () it becomes . The rate rises with stirring or flow velocity and not with enzyme loading.

  3. Zero-order surface kinetics (): rate and . This is self-consistent only if and the resulting still satisfies ; otherwise use the full balance.

EXAM TIP

Read the definition a question gives. The name Damköhler number is also used for other rate ratios — the first-order group above, or reactor-scale groups such as (reaction rate against residence time ). The regime boundaries above are stated for .

WORKED EXAMPLE

An enzyme is covalently attached to the outer surface of non-porous glass beads. Per unit bead surface area, mol m s and mol/m. The bulk substrate concentration is mol/m and the liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient is m/s. Find the Damköhler number, the surface substrate concentration, the observed rate per unit area and the external effectiveness factor.

Solution
  1. and .

  2. Balance in dimensionless form: , i.e. .

  3. Positive root: , so mol/m.

  4. Observed rate mol m s. The surface kinetics give the same value: .

  5. Rate if the surface saw the bulk concentration: mol m s.

  6. . Here is comparable with , so neither the film nor the reaction can be neglected.

Answer: ; mol/m; observed rate mol m s; .

Internal diffusion: Thiele modulus and effectiveness factor

When the enzyme is spread through a porous particle or gel bead, substrate diffuses inward with an effective diffusivity (m/s; lower than the free-solution value because of porosity and tortuosity) and reacts as it goes. The rate is written per unit particle volume (mol m s). For first-order kinetics with (s). The particle surface is at ; if the external film is negligible, .

The standard analysis assumes steady state, an isothermal particle, enzyme spread uniformly through it, constant , and no partitioning between the liquid and the particle (with a partition coefficient , the concentration just inside the surface is ).

STEADY-STATE DIFFUSION–REACTION BALANCE (SPHERE)

Shell balance on a thin spherical shell with constant ; symmetry gives zero gradient at the centre. For a slab the left side is with measured from the mid-plane.

EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR (INTERNAL)

Referred to the surface concentration , not the bulk. for first-order and Michaelis–Menten kinetics.

THIELE MODULUS, FIRST ORDER (CHARACTERISTIC LENGTH VP/AP)

compares the characteristic reaction rate with the characteristic diffusion rate. For a slab, is the half-thickness when both faces are exposed (the full thickness when one face is sealed). is a radius, not a diameter.

Geometry

Characteristic length

Exact first-order effectiveness factor

Concentration profile

Slab, both faces exposed

(half-thickness)

, from the mid-plane

Long cylinder

Sphere

EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR, SLAB, FIRST ORDER

= half-thickness with both faces exposed. Exact for isothermal first-order kinetics.

EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR, SPHERE, FIRST ORDER

= particle radius. Exact for isothermal first-order kinetics.

SAME SPHERE RESULT, OTHER COMMON CONVENTION

Gives identical numbers; only the modulus is defined without the factor 1/3. In this convention the large-modulus limit is .

LIMITS (ANY SHAPE, MODULUS BASED ON VP/AP)

Small : reaction is slow compared with diffusion and the whole particle sees . Large : substrate is consumed in a thin shell near the surface and the core is starved. For a slab is within 1% of once (). A sphere converges more slowly — at , overestimates by about 12% — hence the correction term, which is within 1% of the exact value for .

EXAM TIP

Radius, not diameter: bead sizes are usually quoted as diameters, so halve first. Then check which modulus the question defines — with the strong-limitation result is , not .

EXAM TIP

In the strong-limitation regime : halving the particle radius doubles and doubles the rate per unit particle volume, while at small particle size hardly matters. With the enzyme spread uniformly and unchanged, doubling the enzyme loading doubles , raises by , and raises the observed rate only by a factor of when .

Michaelis–Menten kinetics inside the particle

With the balance is non-linear and depends on two groups: a Thiele modulus and . At the kinetics are first order and the results above apply with . As rises, the enzyme is saturated wherever , so a fall in local concentration costs little rate: for the same , , and particle size the effectiveness factor is higher than in the first-order case, and it tends to 1 as .

A generalised modulus folds the kinetics into one number. With it, the curves for different shapes and kinetics coincide at both ends ( at small modulus, at large modulus) and nearly coincide in between.

GENERALISED THIELE MODULUS (ANY KINETICS)

Constant , isothermal particle. Reduces to for first-order kinetics. The lower limit of the integral is 0 for an irreversible reaction.

GENERALISED MODULUS FOR MICHAELIS–MENTEN KINETICS

is the first-order modulus; is the natural logarithm. The factor multiplying tends to 1 as and to as , and decreases steadily in between, so falls as rises.

ZERO-ORDER LIMIT AND THE EXACT SLAB RESULT

The zero-order limit of Michaelis–Menten kinetics (); the slab result is exact for truly zero-order kinetics. For substrate is exhausted at a penetration depth from each face, and the enzyme beyond it is idle. For a real Michaelis–Menten enzyme the rate tapers off smoothly near that front, so there the result is an approximation.

EXAM TIP

For an isothermal particle, an effectiveness factor above 1 needs kinetics in which a lower concentration gives a higher rate — substrate inhibition is the standard case. For first-order and Michaelis–Menten kinetics in an isothermal particle always. (A strongly exothermic reaction in a non-isothermal particle can also give .)

Observable modulus and combined resistances

The Thiele modulus needs the intrinsic or , which is exactly what cannot be measured on a diffusion-limited catalyst. The observable (Weisz) modulus uses the measured rate instead, so it can be computed from experimental data alone and tells you whether internal diffusion matters.

OBSERVABLE (WEISZ) MODULUS

= measured rate per unit particle volume. The identity holds for first-order kinetics with based on .

Weisz guidelines (first-order kinetics; the thresholds are conventions, not sharp boundaries)

  1. : internal diffusion limitation is weak; for a sphere and for a slab.

  2. : strong internal limitation; for a sphere ( for a slab), and approaches as grows.

  3. In between, compute and properly — neither limit is safe.

OBSERVABLE MODULUS FOR A SPHERE, FIRST ORDER (EXACT)

From with the exact sphere . For large , .

EXTERNAL FILM PLUS INTERNAL DIFFUSION, FIRST ORDER

Rate per unit particle volume, from . For isothermal first-order kinetics does not depend on , so the two resistances simply add.

SAME RESULT IN TERMS OF THE MASS-TRANSFER BIOT NUMBER

First order, with based on and referred to . compares film transport with internal diffusion; the identity turns the series-resistance result into this form. If a question defines for a sphere together with , the second term is . Large : the film is negligible and .

OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS FACTOR

Referred to the bulk concentration. It is the product of the external and internal factors because .

WORKED EXAMPLE

An enzyme is entrapped uniformly in spherical gel beads of diameter 3.0 mm. Per unit bead volume, mol m s and mol/m. The effective diffusivity of the substrate in the gel is m/s and the substrate concentration at the bead surface is mol/m. Find the Thiele modulus, the effectiveness factor, the observed rate per unit bead volume and the observable modulus.

Solution
  1. , so treat the kinetics as first order: s.

  2. m, so m and .

  3. .

  4. mol m s, against with no diffusion limitation.

  5. ; check: .

  6. : internal diffusion is significant, and the beads deliver only about 42% of the rate their enzyme would give if all of it saw the surface concentration . Smaller beads would raise .

Answer: ; ; mol m s; .

Apparent kinetic parameters and exam traps

When diffusion limits the rate, fitting the measured rates to Michaelis–Menten or Arrhenius forms returns apparent parameters that describe the particle, not the enzyme. The strong-limitation results below all follow from .

OBSERVED RATE UNDER STRONG INTERNAL LIMITATION, FIRST ORDER

Valid for . The observed rate scales with , hence with the square root of the enzyme loading (uniformly spread enzyme), and inversely with particle size.

APPARENT ACTIVATION ENERGY

Strong internal diffusion limitation () in an isothermal particle, where . = intrinsic activation energy of the enzyme reaction; = activation energy of diffusion, usually small. Under external film control the apparent value falls further, to the low value of liquid-film mass transfer.

APPARENT REACTION ORDER

Strong internal limitation (), isothermal particle, intrinsic power-law order (): first order stays first order and zero order appears as half order. A Michaelis–Menten enzyme that is saturated at the surface () under strong limitation therefore shows .

BULK CONCENTRATION AT HALF THE MAXIMUM RATE (EXTERNAL FILM, EXACT)

Surface-bound enzyme with Michaelis–Menten kinetics and a liquid film. The plateau is still ; half of it needs at the surface, and the film must then carry , so . This bulk half-saturation concentration is what the measured curve shows as its apparent . Because the whole curve is not exactly Michaelis–Menten, a fitted by linearisation depends on the substrate range used.

What diffusion does to the measured Michaelis–Menten constants

  1. : at low substrate the rate is held down by diffusion, so half-saturation appears at a higher concentration.

  2. if the substrate concentration can be made high enough: the enzyme saturates, so inside a particle and the rate tends to at a surface. A loss of activity caused by immobilisation itself (conformational or steric) lowers the true as well.

  3. A Lineweaver–Burk plot of diffusion-limited data curves instead of being straight; a straight-line fit to it gives apparent, not intrinsic, constants.

  4. Partitioning on a charged support multiplies by without changing .

Controlling step

Observed rate responds to

Apparent order in substrate

Apparent activation energy

Reaction (kinetic) control: ,

Enzyme loading (proportionally) and temperature

Intrinsic (Michaelis–Menten)

External film:

Stirring or flow velocity, through ; not enzyme loading

First order in

Low, that of liquid-film mass transfer

Strong internal diffusion:

Particle size (rate per unit particle volume ) and the square root of enzyme loading; not stirring

EXAM TIP

Which concentration? The internal is referred to ; and are referred to . If a question says the external film is negligible, and .

EXAM TIP

Compare with , not with 1 alone. At low substrate a value with still gives : the surface is largely reaction controlled, because the relevant group is .

EXAM TIP

Units: keep the rate per unit particle volume for internal diffusion and per unit external surface area for surface-bound enzyme. Converting a rate given per mass of support or per reactor volume needs the particle density or the solids volume fraction.

PREVIOUS-YEAR QUESTIONS

2 questions from the BT papers

Try each question first, then open the answer. We placed each question under a topic ourselves; the exam paper does not label topics.

See these papers in full: GATE BT 2025 · GATE BT 2022

GATE 2025 BT Q.54

GATE 2025 · BTQ.54 · 2 marks · MSQ

An enzyme immobilised in a porous spherical pellet, catalyses a strongly mass-transfer limited first-order reaction. The effectiveness factor for the immobilised enzyme reaction increases with the

  1. (A)

    decrease in the size of the pellet

  2. (B)

    increase in the pore diffusivity within the pellet

  3. (C)

    decrease in the enzyme turnover number

  4. (D)

    increase in the enzyme concentration within the pellet

Answer and solution
See the question in the paper
GATE 2025 BT Q.54: answer and solution

GATE 2022 BT Q.48

GATE 2022 · BTQ.48 · 2 marks · MSQ

Which of the following statements are CORRECT for an enzyme entrapped in a spherical particle?

  1. (A)

    Effectiveness factor is ratio of the reaction rate with diffusion-limitation to the reaction rate without diffusion-limitation

  2. (B)

    Internal diffusion is rate-limiting at low values of Thiele modulus

  3. (C)

    Effectiveness factor increases with decrease in Thiele modulus

  4. (D)

    Internal diffusion-limitation can be reduced by decreasing the size of the particle

Answer and solution
See the question in the paper
GATE 2022 BT Q.48: answer and solution

PRACTICE

5 questions to test yourself

PRACTICE 11 mark · MCQ

An enzyme whose free form has its pH optimum at 7.0 is covalently immobilised on a support carrying a high density of negative charge, and is used in a buffer of low ionic strength. With the pH–activity curve plotted against the pH of the bulk solution, the optimum of the immobilised enzyme is expected to

  1. (A)

    shift to a pH below 7.0

  2. (B)

    shift to a pH above 7.0

  3. (C)

    remain at 7.0, because covalent binding does not change the active site

  4. (D)

    remain at 7.0, with a narrower pH–activity curve

Answer and solution

Answer: (B)

  1. A negatively charged support has and attracts : . At low ionic strength this charge is not screened by salt.

  2. So the local pH near the enzyme is lower than the bulk pH.

  3. For the enzyme to see its intrinsic optimum of 7.0 locally, the bulk pH must be above 7.0: the apparent optimum shifts to the alkaline side. Answer (B).

PRACTICE 22 marks · NAT

An enzyme is entrapped uniformly in spherical gel beads of diameter 6.0 mm. Per unit bead volume, mol m s and mol/m. The effective diffusivity of the substrate in the gel is m/s and the substrate concentration at the bead surface is 0.050 mol/m. The external film resistance is negligible. Assuming first-order kinetics and using the exact isothermal first-order effectiveness-factor expression for a sphere, the effectiveness factor is ______ (rounded off to three decimal places).

Answer and solution

Answer: (accepted range )

  1. , so first order: s.

  2. m, so m and .

  3. .

  4. Check with the other convention, : . The asymptote would overestimate it.

PRACTICE 32 marks · MSQ

An enzyme with first-order kinetics (rate constant per unit particle volume) is immobilised uniformly in porous spherical beads of radius . The Thiele modulus is defined as and the external film resistance is negligible. Which of the following statements is/are correct?

  1. (A)

    As , the effectiveness factor tends to 1.

  2. (B)

    When (large enough that is also ), halving the bead radius with everything else unchanged approximately doubles the effectiveness factor.

  3. (C)

    When , the apparent activation energy is approximately equal to the intrinsic activation energy of the enzyme reaction.

  4. (D)

    When , doubling the enzyme loading per unit bead volume (which doubles , with unchanged) increases the observed rate per unit bead volume by a factor of about .

Answer and solution

Answer: (A), (B), (D)

  1. (A) Small : diffusion is fast compared with reaction, the whole bead sees and . Correct.

  2. (B) For , and , so halving halves and, while is still large, doubles . Correct.

  3. (C) Here , so , about half the intrinsic value. Incorrect.

  4. (D) In this regime , so doubling multiplies the rate by . Correct.

  5. Answer: A, B, D.

PRACTICE 41 mark · NAT

An enzyme is attached only to the outer surface of non-porous beads. Per unit surface area, mol m s and mol/m. The bulk substrate concentration is 0.20 mol/m and the liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient is m/s. Treating the surface kinetics as first order (substrate concentration much smaller than ), the external effectiveness factor, defined as the observed rate divided by the rate the surface would give at the bulk concentration, is ______ (rounded off to two decimal places).

Answer and solution

Answer: (accepted range )

  1. Surface first-order rate constant: m/s.

  2. .

  3. The balance gives .

  4. . (Solving the full Michaelis–Menten balance gives 0.255, inside the same answer range.)

PRACTICE 52 marks · NAT

Spherical beads of radius 1.5 mm contain an immobilised enzyme with first-order kinetics, s per unit bead volume. The internal effectiveness factor of the beads is 0.40 (independent of concentration, as for any isothermal first-order reaction). The liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient around the beads is m/s and the bulk substrate concentration is 0.20 mol/m. The overall effectiveness factor, defined as the observed rate per unit bead volume divided by times the bulk concentration, is ______ (rounded off to two decimal places).

Answer and solution

Answer: (accepted range )

  1. External area per unit bead volume: m, so s.

  2. Internal: s.

  3. Film flux equals reaction: , so mol/m.

  4. mol m s.

  5. , which is the product .

  6. Check with the Biot form: , so and .

OFFICIAL GATE 2027 SYLLABUS WORDING

Copied from the GATE 2027 syllabus; see all 2027 syllabi.

GATE BT

Enzyme immobilization, diffusion effects - Thiele modulus, effectiveness factor, Damkoehler number

Preparing in Kolkata? IAE Academy's course for GATE BT.